Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
BEWARE, Problems with Exbal and G7 BC's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ericpetritz" data-source="post: 447944" data-attributes="member: 5958"><p>It is very interesting to me that Bigngreen is getting very similiar results with Loadbase as I am getting with the "upgraded" version of Exbal. I do not have Loadbase but it seems like some of the programs are calculating drops of around 430" and some of the programs are calculating drops of around 447" at 1000 yards. The questions is: Which one is correct? I am not sure at this point. Perhaps it has to do with the atmospheric standards as Bryan mentioned (ASM vs ICAO)?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ericpetritz, post: 447944, member: 5958"] It is very interesting to me that Bigngreen is getting very similiar results with Loadbase as I am getting with the "upgraded" version of Exbal. I do not have Loadbase but it seems like some of the programs are calculating drops of around 430" and some of the programs are calculating drops of around 447" at 1000 yards. The questions is: Which one is correct? I am not sure at this point. Perhaps it has to do with the atmospheric standards as Bryan mentioned (ASM vs ICAO)? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
BEWARE, Problems with Exbal and G7 BC's
Top