Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Berger LR bullets?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MudRunner2005" data-source="post: 1290068" data-attributes="member: 12995"><p>My first response was mainly because this has already been brought up in 2 other threads...</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/field-test-five-big-game-bullets-183711/" target="_blank">http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/field-test-five-big-game-bullets-183711/</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/bullet-test-5-top-premium-lr-308-bullets-183785/" target="_blank">http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/bullet-test-5-top-premium-lr-308-bullets-183785/</a></p><p></p><p>But yes, I do shoot Berger. I have had just about every major brand of bullet fail at some point or another...Including Nosler, Hornady, Berger, and Barnes...And I still use Bergers, because despite the 1 failure it still performed flawlessly. They are all man-made and have failures. I also don't think that test was very fair, and quite frankly felt it was blatantly bias towards the ELD-X... Why would you compare a 190 VLD to a 212 ELD-X, when Berger offers much closer comparisons like the 210 VLD and the 215 Hybrid... It was an obvious sandbag for personal bias. If someone is going to do a "professional" test, they should at least be professional about it enough to accept the results, even if their favorite bullet doesn't win, instead of sandbagging the outcome to fit their narrative.</p><p></p><p>Just my $0.02...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MudRunner2005, post: 1290068, member: 12995"] My first response was mainly because this has already been brought up in 2 other threads... [url]http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/field-test-five-big-game-bullets-183711/[/url] [url]http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/bullet-test-5-top-premium-lr-308-bullets-183785/[/url] But yes, I do shoot Berger. I have had just about every major brand of bullet fail at some point or another...Including Nosler, Hornady, Berger, and Barnes...And I still use Bergers, because despite the 1 failure it still performed flawlessly. They are all man-made and have failures. I also don't think that test was very fair, and quite frankly felt it was blatantly bias towards the ELD-X... Why would you compare a 190 VLD to a 212 ELD-X, when Berger offers much closer comparisons like the 210 VLD and the 215 Hybrid... It was an obvious sandbag for personal bias. If someone is going to do a "professional" test, they should at least be professional about it enough to accept the results, even if their favorite bullet doesn't win, instead of sandbagging the outcome to fit their narrative. Just my $0.02... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Berger LR bullets?
Top