Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
BERGER 210 bc ???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 658156" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>Qualifiers to any bullet's BC is velocity, drag model, and a standard atmosphere.</p><p>The only bullet makers qualifying their BCs(for us) are Sierra, and Berger.</p><p>Sierra provides 1-3 G1 BCs by associated velocities at Std.Metro.</p><p>Berger's single G1 & G7 BCs account for reducing BC in flight via average BC to velocities, at ICAO. </p><p></p><p>Exbal would likely be less accurate using a single 'peak' BC (.631).</p><p>So I would use Berger's number (.616) if I were you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 658156, member: 1521"] Qualifiers to any bullet's BC is velocity, drag model, and a standard atmosphere. The only bullet makers qualifying their BCs(for us) are Sierra, and Berger. Sierra provides 1-3 G1 BCs by associated velocities at Std.Metro. Berger's single G1 & G7 BCs account for reducing BC in flight via average BC to velocities, at ICAO. Exbal would likely be less accurate using a single 'peak' BC (.631). So I would use Berger's number (.616) if I were you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
BERGER 210 bc ???
Top