Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barrel porting vs. muzzle break vs. suppressor ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="just_jon" data-source="post: 2873160" data-attributes="member: 112153"><p>I had a number of magnum rifles and several pistols mag-na-ported back when brakes were not so prevalent. While porting did reduce recoil by maybe 20%, my goal was to reduce muzzle rise to allow for a quicker follow up shot. It does that in spades. Porting did not increase the noise level of my rifles. </p><p></p><p>After shooting rifles with brakes, I would not consider having a rifle ported. Then again, 40 years on, I'm more focused on recoil reduction and being able to call most of my shots.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="just_jon, post: 2873160, member: 112153"] I had a number of magnum rifles and several pistols mag-na-ported back when brakes were not so prevalent. While porting did reduce recoil by maybe 20%, my goal was to reduce muzzle rise to allow for a quicker follow up shot. It does that in spades. Porting did not increase the noise level of my rifles. After shooting rifles with brakes, I would not consider having a rifle ported. Then again, 40 years on, I'm more focused on recoil reduction and being able to call most of my shots. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barrel porting vs. muzzle break vs. suppressor ?
Top