Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes TTSX vs. Hornady CX?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CJ Reichelt" data-source="post: 3025543" data-attributes="member: 103249"><p>Been shooting the 160 GR CX out of my 280AI this season. Shot an Antelope at 450 yards, a whitetail buck at 400 yards, and a cow elk at 645 yards. All were complete pass throughs. No meat damage on any of them. Have learned that you need to trust your accuracy and shot placement with these bullets as you don't get the "whop"sound on impact like you do with an accubond or other non mono bullet. I will continue to use these and have some 90 gr CX loaded up for the 243 next year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CJ Reichelt, post: 3025543, member: 103249"] Been shooting the 160 GR CX out of my 280AI this season. Shot an Antelope at 450 yards, a whitetail buck at 400 yards, and a cow elk at 645 yards. All were complete pass throughs. No meat damage on any of them. Have learned that you need to trust your accuracy and shot placement with these bullets as you don't get the "whop"sound on impact like you do with an accubond or other non mono bullet. I will continue to use these and have some 90 gr CX loaded up for the 243 next year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes TTSX vs. Hornady CX?
Top