Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes TTSX 180g report
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="projp" data-source="post: 430762" data-attributes="member: 9992"><p>Great Buck!!!</p><p>I switched to Barnes x bullets in 1995 after a few bad experiences with pushing small bullets to fast and picking up the pieces.</p><p>Since then my family has taken approximately </p><p>30 mule deer...2 points to 200"</p><p>8 elk.......5 points to 385"</p><p>2 shirus moose</p><p>1 goat</p><p>Half a dozen antelope</p><p>In calibers .243, 25-06, 257Weatherby, 7MM Mag, 7MM WSM, 7MM STW, 7MM Ultra Mag, 308, 30-06, & 300 Win Mag, </p><p>Most were hand loads with a few factory rounds .</p><p>Probably 95% have been one shot kills with most being lung shots broad side.</p><p>I have never experienced the run for a mile after being shot like some others. In fact the reason I converted everyone to Barnes was the first 3 deer we shot were lung shots that dropped within 10 yards. Before, using off the shelf ammo, I was used to lunging them and having them go 50 to 100 yds and expire.</p><p>Ranges have been from 50 yds to about 550 yds with the average being about 300yds. </p><p>The earlier "X" and XLC's seemed to be quite finicky about how they shot out of different guns. I could usually find a load that worked though. The TSX and TTSX seem to be easier to get to group, although we have a 300 Win Mag that absolutely refuses to like any Barnes bullit. </p><p>I had a bad experience with 338 accubond that went to pieces on a mooses leg, so I will put up with the small inconviences of the Barnes because I know they will stay together.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="projp, post: 430762, member: 9992"] Great Buck!!! I switched to Barnes x bullets in 1995 after a few bad experiences with pushing small bullets to fast and picking up the pieces. Since then my family has taken approximately 30 mule deer...2 points to 200" 8 elk.......5 points to 385" 2 shirus moose 1 goat Half a dozen antelope In calibers .243, 25-06, 257Weatherby, 7MM Mag, 7MM WSM, 7MM STW, 7MM Ultra Mag, 308, 30-06, & 300 Win Mag, Most were hand loads with a few factory rounds . Probably 95% have been one shot kills with most being lung shots broad side. I have never experienced the run for a mile after being shot like some others. In fact the reason I converted everyone to Barnes was the first 3 deer we shot were lung shots that dropped within 10 yards. Before, using off the shelf ammo, I was used to lunging them and having them go 50 to 100 yds and expire. Ranges have been from 50 yds to about 550 yds with the average being about 300yds. The earlier "X" and XLC's seemed to be quite finicky about how they shot out of different guns. I could usually find a load that worked though. The TSX and TTSX seem to be easier to get to group, although we have a 300 Win Mag that absolutely refuses to like any Barnes bullit. I had a bad experience with 338 accubond that went to pieces on a mooses leg, so I will put up with the small inconviences of the Barnes because I know they will stay together. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes TTSX 180g report
Top