Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes Response to Berger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 313078" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>Not impressed. </p><p></p><p>Michael, I hate to have to be the one to tell you that you're establishing a reputation that you don't know what you don't know. Open your mind. Take a physics course or two.</p><p></p><p>If you didn't like the sand bag proposition, you could have bit on the propped up deer, goat, sheep, pig, or dog experiment. Shoot them in any neck vertebrae of your choosing. Shoot them anywhere that thrills ya. You won't even get a rigored adult Lab to do acrobatics. Take some video. It will be b-o-r-i-n-g. Now if you'd like to video barn rats, red squirrels, or ground squirrels, then you'll have something worth watching. Let me know and I'll tune in.</p><p></p><p>You display a touch of arrogance. And presume to know too much about me, or my history of harvesting deer or other large game. Been at this hobby with a passion for 41 years now. Not that it matters. You'd still be plain old-fashioned wrong. Time to eat crow. </p><p></p><p>And as I suggested - you could have PM'd Roy before 'correcting' me. His porker had those all-important legs and neck vertebrae. Watch his video and learn. Will you object if the porker's legs are pointed up rather than down? It won't matter - not if the bullet energy/impact alone is responsible for the acrobatics you've observed. But if you're convinced that it matters, then prop a dead 200 lb animal up <strong>on it's feet </strong>and blaze away.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 313078, member: 4191"] Not impressed. Michael, I hate to have to be the one to tell you that you're establishing a reputation that you don't know what you don't know. Open your mind. Take a physics course or two. If you didn't like the sand bag proposition, you could have bit on the propped up deer, goat, sheep, pig, or dog experiment. Shoot them in any neck vertebrae of your choosing. Shoot them anywhere that thrills ya. You won't even get a rigored adult Lab to do acrobatics. Take some video. It will be b-o-r-i-n-g. Now if you'd like to video barn rats, red squirrels, or ground squirrels, then you'll have something worth watching. Let me know and I'll tune in. You display a touch of arrogance. And presume to know too much about me, or my history of harvesting deer or other large game. Been at this hobby with a passion for 41 years now. Not that it matters. You'd still be plain old-fashioned wrong. Time to eat crow. And as I suggested - you could have PM'd Roy before 'correcting' me. His porker had those all-important legs and neck vertebrae. Watch his video and learn. Will you object if the porker's legs are pointed up rather than down? It won't matter - not if the bullet energy/impact alone is responsible for the acrobatics you've observed. But if you're convinced that it matters, then prop a dead 200 lb animal up [B]on it's feet [/B]and blaze away. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes Response to Berger
Top