Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes Response to Berger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryanLitz" data-source="post: 312668" data-attributes="member: 7848"><p>idig4au,</p><p>I think your question can be answered by how the products are represented compared to how they are actually found to perform. </p><p></p><p>This is a public discussion board where people can share their real world experiences about product performance. </p><p></p><p>If a company claims some specific performance, and the product does not achieve that level of performance, this is the place where uncensored customer feedback is shared. </p><p></p><p>The reason why some products get 'crucified' here is probably because they don't live up to their billing. If they were represented fairly, there wouldn't be any problem. It's only when something is sold as one thing, and falls short that people get angry. When one product is sold as the absolute best, all around performing 'thing' ever, at any price, to be found anywhere, never to be matched or exceeded.... It's likely to fall short, and people will hoist the BS flag. Not because of how the 'thing' <em>actually</em> performed, but because it was inaccurately represented.</p><p></p><p>You said:</p><p></p><p>And that's fine. We're not engaged in this discussion to talk people out of shooting Barnes bullets. We're engaged in this discussion because those at Barnes were not happy with "Enough Said". They had to make up more stuff (misleading and unsupportable stuff) about how their bullets are better than all others. The reaction that they were 'crucified' here is simply the customer feedback mechanism which works the same way every time a product falls short of it's representation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Long Time Long Ranger,</p><p>When you get the time, please identify any specific statements made by myself or Eric in this thread that you don't agree with. If you don't agree with us because you believe we've made false or unsupportable/unverifiable statements, please identify them specifically. If you're just mad for some other, less constructive reason, don't expect a reply.</p><p></p><p>Thank you,</p><p>-Bryan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryanLitz, post: 312668, member: 7848"] idig4au, I think your question can be answered by how the products are represented compared to how they are actually found to perform. This is a public discussion board where people can share their real world experiences about product performance. If a company claims some specific performance, and the product does not achieve that level of performance, this is the place where uncensored customer feedback is shared. The reason why some products get 'crucified' here is probably because they don't live up to their billing. If they were represented fairly, there wouldn't be any problem. It's only when something is sold as one thing, and falls short that people get angry. When one product is sold as the absolute best, all around performing 'thing' ever, at any price, to be found anywhere, never to be matched or exceeded.... It's likely to fall short, and people will hoist the BS flag. Not because of how the 'thing' [i]actually[/i] performed, but because it was inaccurately represented. You said: And that's fine. We're not engaged in this discussion to talk people out of shooting Barnes bullets. We're engaged in this discussion because those at Barnes were not happy with "Enough Said". They had to make up more stuff (misleading and unsupportable stuff) about how their bullets are better than all others. The reaction that they were 'crucified' here is simply the customer feedback mechanism which works the same way every time a product falls short of it's representation. Long Time Long Ranger, When you get the time, please identify any specific statements made by myself or Eric in this thread that you don't agree with. If you don't agree with us because you believe we've made false or unsupportable/unverifiable statements, please identify them specifically. If you're just mad for some other, less constructive reason, don't expect a reply. Thank you, -Bryan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes Response to Berger
Top