Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes 190 LRX for 300 wsm
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buffalo Chip" data-source="post: 1828528" data-attributes="member: 103871"><p>I reread you're thread title and I see you were talking Barnes bullets. I had good luck with the 175, I never tried the 190.</p><p>I did kill 3 or 4 mule deer with that bullet and they always performed well for me. I like Barnes bullets. I believe their marketing about going with a little lighter bullet because they penetrate so well. The only reason I switched to the 190 ABLR is the whopping .640 BC. </p><p></p><p>I was running Hodgdon Hybrid 100V. 63 grains was giving me 3040 fps with the 175 LRX.</p><p></p><p>Stu</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buffalo Chip, post: 1828528, member: 103871"] I reread you're thread title and I see you were talking Barnes bullets. I had good luck with the 175, I never tried the 190. I did kill 3 or 4 mule deer with that bullet and they always performed well for me. I like Barnes bullets. I believe their marketing about going with a little lighter bullet because they penetrate so well. The only reason I switched to the 190 ABLR is the whopping .640 BC. I was running Hodgdon Hybrid 100V. 63 grains was giving me 3040 fps with the 175 LRX. Stu [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes 190 LRX for 300 wsm
Top