Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Ballistics Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 655034" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>I disagree.</p><p>Minute of Angle, is an exact value. Therefore anything not an exact increment of MOA -is not MOA.</p><p>It is the same with MILs, and nobody should be running around describing some sort of 'shooter's MILs'.</p><p>Anything can be expressed in Inches per Hundred Yards though. So if adjustments are not another REAL term(like MOA or MILs) you still have IPHY.</p><p></p><p>It is always amazing how shooters generalize things, even when there is no reason to.</p><p>That scope makers also do it must be taken as an insult. i.e. they think we're stupid...</p><p>Again, even when they don't have to!</p><p></p><p>The tech at Sightron was lying to you. Your scope is as close to MOA as it's going to get.</p><p>You were smart in testing to find your adjustment value. And now you know EXACTLY what to use in ballistic software.</p><p>Problem solved. Good job.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 655034, member: 1521"] I disagree. Minute of Angle, is an exact value. Therefore anything not an exact increment of MOA -is not MOA. It is the same with MILs, and nobody should be running around describing some sort of 'shooter's MILs'. Anything can be expressed in Inches per Hundred Yards though. So if adjustments are not another REAL term(like MOA or MILs) you still have IPHY. It is always amazing how shooters generalize things, even when there is no reason to. That scope makers also do it must be taken as an insult. i.e. they think we're stupid... Again, even when they don't have to! The tech at Sightron was lying to you. Your scope is as close to MOA as it's going to get. You were smart in testing to find your adjustment value. And now you know EXACTLY what to use in ballistic software. Problem solved. Good job. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Ballistics Question
Top