Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Ballistics isn't the math the math?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dfanonymous" data-source="post: 2542256" data-attributes="member: 97050"><p>Which solver to use is the best?</p><p></p><p>It really doesn't matter. </p><p></p><p>All the big names will do what you need, and have the same problems. The important thing is to fit what the rifle is doing to software. I'm partial to applied ballistics….I subscribe to Bryan Litz's take on a lot of things, so that's what I do. </p><p></p><p>The reason is because I have access to some of the staff, and custom curves, and a kestrel. Combined with proper truing methods and verifying data, a lot of people including myself have great success.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dfanonymous, post: 2542256, member: 97050"] Which solver to use is the best? It really doesn’t matter. All the big names will do what you need, and have the same problems. The important thing is to fit what the rifle is doing to software. I’m partial to applied ballistics….I subscribe to Bryan Litz’s take on a lot of things, so that’s what I do. The reason is because I have access to some of the staff, and custom curves, and a kestrel. Combined with proper truing methods and verifying data, a lot of people including myself have great success. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Ballistics isn't the math the math?
Top