Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Ballistic Coefficient Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Eichele" data-source="post: 900775" data-attributes="member: 1007"><p>Jeff, I hope you know I wasn't knocking Berger for their mistake. I agree they do a better job than most. That's why I also stated that they had no previous 338 pills to reference data against. With the 7mm, there are references. If you cross reference form factors against the sectional densities of each (or using the proportion method), you'll find that to get the hybrid above .730 will take serious form factor changes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Eichele, post: 900775, member: 1007"] Jeff, I hope you know I wasn't knocking Berger for their mistake. I agree they do a better job than most. That's why I also stated that they had no previous 338 pills to reference data against. With the 7mm, there are references. If you cross reference form factors against the sectional densities of each (or using the proportion method), you'll find that to get the hybrid above .730 will take serious form factor changes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Ballistic Coefficient Question
Top