Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
B.c. Crazy!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greyfox" data-source="post: 605689" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>I don't think it's much of an issue for a couple of reasons. First, I would suspect that less than a few percent of the total rifle hunting population know about or cares about ballistic coefficients. Secondly, based upon my experience with the heavy for caliber, high BC hunting VLD's from Berger, they they don't give up much if anything in performance. I have had equal and in a lot of cases better performance at the shorter hunting distances with VLD's then many of the popular performance bullets. IMHO .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greyfox, post: 605689, member: 10291"] I don't think it's much of an issue for a couple of reasons. First, I would suspect that less than a few percent of the total rifle hunting population know about or cares about ballistic coefficients. Secondly, based upon my experience with the heavy for caliber, high BC hunting VLD's from Berger, they they don't give up much if anything in performance. I have had equal and in a lot of cases better performance at the shorter hunting distances with VLD's then many of the popular performance bullets. IMHO . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
B.c. Crazy!
Top