Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
At wits end....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Boozer" data-source="post: 1091249" data-attributes="member: 22146"><p>I've tried 10 different types. Rem corelokt, in both 165, and 180, rem accutips, BHA in 180, fed premium, Hornady, HSM with bergers, and have a box of nosler trophy grade that I haven't tapped into yet. All were tested prior to the David tubbs bullets, so I probably need to retest to see if anything has changed. In general at 100yds, 180s outperformed 165s, and BHA has looked the best. Fed premium wasn't bad. Rem corelokts were the worst, 3-4" groups.</p><p></p><p>Primers on the BHA are FLAT, must be a pretty hot load. FYI.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Boozer, post: 1091249, member: 22146"] I've tried 10 different types. Rem corelokt, in both 165, and 180, rem accutips, BHA in 180, fed premium, Hornady, HSM with bergers, and have a box of nosler trophy grade that I haven't tapped into yet. All were tested prior to the David tubbs bullets, so I probably need to retest to see if anything has changed. In general at 100yds, 180s outperformed 165s, and BHA has looked the best. Fed premium wasn't bad. Rem corelokts were the worst, 3-4" groups. Primers on the BHA are FLAT, must be a pretty hot load. FYI. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
At wits end....
Top