Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
As a Matter of Fact, You Should Start Reloading
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jmgardner" data-source="post: 1350920" data-attributes="member: 98141"><p>Hey Dennis, Thanks for the feedback. you make all valid points, but it really just emphasizes the point I was *trying* to make. More sample size is better than lower sample size. you are right, in order to hit true statistical significance, we likely would burn a barrel out. But we likely agree doubling sample size (from 3 to 5 for groups, or 5-10 for speed data) is going to give a more reliable number while still being practical. and you are probably right that my SD and ES may be not quite right, but that was calculated by my magneto rather than excel or a statistical program. I would guess that most shooters are simply reporting the same. </p><p></p><p>you also make a great point that true ES would explain unexplicable fliers. but from a practical standpoint, if I run ten rounds each of five different charges over a magneto, the one with the lowest reported ES/SD is likely the most consistent charge, regardless of if the reported numbers are 100% accurate. the food for thought is much appreciated! cheers!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jmgardner, post: 1350920, member: 98141"] Hey Dennis, Thanks for the feedback. you make all valid points, but it really just emphasizes the point I was *trying* to make. More sample size is better than lower sample size. you are right, in order to hit true statistical significance, we likely would burn a barrel out. But we likely agree doubling sample size (from 3 to 5 for groups, or 5-10 for speed data) is going to give a more reliable number while still being practical. and you are probably right that my SD and ES may be not quite right, but that was calculated by my magneto rather than excel or a statistical program. I would guess that most shooters are simply reporting the same. you also make a great point that true ES would explain unexplicable fliers. but from a practical standpoint, if I run ten rounds each of five different charges over a magneto, the one with the lowest reported ES/SD is likely the most consistent charge, regardless of if the reported numbers are 100% accurate. the food for thought is much appreciated! cheers! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
As a Matter of Fact, You Should Start Reloading
Top