Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Are we too critical of modern bullets?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WildRose" data-source="post: 907861" data-attributes="member: 30902"><p>Perhaps I was unclear.</p><p></p><p>What mfg's are not testing their bullets on either carcases or ballistic gel? Where does this information come from?</p><p></p><p>As for your tests, your results are what they are but all results will vary based on the conditions of the test. If you are not testing under the same conditions as the mfg therefore your results are going to be different.</p><p></p><p>I too think a lot of listed bc's are at best theoretical vs proven but then again BC's are not static. They will vary with velocity, range, and conditions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WildRose, post: 907861, member: 30902"] Perhaps I was unclear. What mfg's are not testing their bullets on either carcases or ballistic gel? Where does this information come from? As for your tests, your results are what they are but all results will vary based on the conditions of the test. If you are not testing under the same conditions as the mfg therefore your results are going to be different. I too think a lot of listed bc's are at best theoretical vs proven but then again BC's are not static. They will vary with velocity, range, and conditions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Are we too critical of modern bullets?
Top