Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
are carbon fiber barrels the wave of the future?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 1981580" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>So you have no data from any manufacturer? Or you choose to keep that to yourself.</p><p></p><p>At least now I know the basis for your positive and promotional posts. You've subscribed to the manufacturers' sales literature on their barrel cooling rates. Promoted that feature here, and continue to, without any of the prerequisite verification data. If that meets your accountability standards, and encourages you to repeat their sales pitch, good for you. Do you expect, or demand, that others also accept that literature at face value? When I identify the CFW material specification needed to verify the manufacturers' heat transfer claims, why the surprise and defensiveness? Between the two or us, if anyone's defensiveness has turned offensive, it's yours.</p><p></p><p>I currently own, shoot, and hunt with a Proof CFW barrel. And ordered two Bartlein CFW barrels in the past two weeks. One is with my gunsmith now. Will replace a SS barrel on one of my rifles. So you're wrong about that too.</p><p></p><p>You've referenced Christensen, and suggested their CFW is likely based on the best of the best. Straight out of the mission to Mars space industry. I tell you Christensen's staff engineer provided a forum member with a heat transfer coefficient that demonstrates their CFW will cool 3-4 times slower than steel. You never skip a beat. Your drum roll continues.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for at least clarifying you have no CFW specs upon which to base your effusive and positive CFW barrel cooling posts. I'll let you carry on now. Enjoy yourself...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 1981580, member: 4191"] So you have no data from any manufacturer? Or you choose to keep that to yourself. At least now I know the basis for your positive and promotional posts. You've subscribed to the manufacturers' sales literature on their barrel cooling rates. Promoted that feature here, and continue to, without any of the prerequisite verification data. If that meets your accountability standards, and encourages you to repeat their sales pitch, good for you. Do you expect, or demand, that others also accept that literature at face value? When I identify the CFW material specification needed to verify the manufacturers' heat transfer claims, why the surprise and defensiveness? Between the two or us, if anyone's defensiveness has turned offensive, it's yours. I currently own, shoot, and hunt with a Proof CFW barrel. And ordered two Bartlein CFW barrels in the past two weeks. One is with my gunsmith now. Will replace a SS barrel on one of my rifles. So you're wrong about that too. You've referenced Christensen, and suggested their CFW is likely based on the best of the best. Straight out of the mission to Mars space industry. I tell you Christensen's staff engineer provided a forum member with a heat transfer coefficient that demonstrates their CFW will cool 3-4 times slower than steel. You never skip a beat. Your drum roll continues. Thanks for at least clarifying you have no CFW specs upon which to base your effusive and positive CFW barrel cooling posts. I'll let you carry on now. Enjoy yourself... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
are carbon fiber barrels the wave of the future?
Top