Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Anyone wish they would have bought the NX8 4-32x50 over the 2.5-20?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bater" data-source="post: 2137190" data-attributes="member: 76134"><p>I much prefer my 4-32 over my pards 2.5-20. Seems easier to get behind, can tell no difference in weight and the extra magnification is a huge plus for western hunting. And I don't have an issue w/ touchy parallax or tight eye box in the least. If you truly want something more compact the 2.5-25 March would be my pick over the 2.5-20 NX8 for close to the same $. Just my .02</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bater, post: 2137190, member: 76134"] I much prefer my 4-32 over my pards 2.5-20. Seems easier to get behind, can tell no difference in weight and the extra magnification is a huge plus for western hunting. And I don’t have an issue w/ touchy parallax or tight eye box in the least. If you truly want something more compact the 2.5-25 March would be my pick over the 2.5-20 NX8 for close to the same $. Just my .02 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Anyone wish they would have bought the NX8 4-32x50 over the 2.5-20?
Top