Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Anyone wish they would have bought the NX8 4-32x50 over the 2.5-20?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brentc" data-source="post: 2135734" data-attributes="member: 16938"><p>For me, it's about the physical dimensions of the 2.5-20 that don't allow mounting far enough back to obtain proper relief due to mount clearance. </p><p></p><p>Here is a picture of both scopes mounted for proper eye relief. You can see on the short action that the objective bell of the 2.5-20 allows for just enough clearance from the front edge of the base. The longer rail of a LA base will interfere here especially if the base extends forward of the receiver.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]256969[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brentc, post: 2135734, member: 16938"] For me, it's about the physical dimensions of the 2.5-20 that don't allow mounting far enough back to obtain proper relief due to mount clearance. Here is a picture of both scopes mounted for proper eye relief. You can see on the short action that the objective bell of the 2.5-20 allows for just enough clearance from the front edge of the base. The longer rail of a LA base will interfere here especially if the base extends forward of the receiver. [ATTACH type="full"]256969[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Anyone wish they would have bought the NX8 4-32x50 over the 2.5-20?
Top