Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Anyone wish they would have bought the NX8 4-32x50 over the 2.5-20?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brentc" data-source="post: 2134893" data-attributes="member: 16938"><p>After owning and using both scopes, from magnification range to mounting ergonomics, the 4-32 is the more versatile scope.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't even consider a 2.5-20 for a 300 RUM, or any long action for that matter. The ergonomics of the 2.5-20 make it really difficult to properly set eye relief on anything other than short actions. Getting the eye relief right with these scopes is critical to minimize the eye box issues many guys have.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brentc, post: 2134893, member: 16938"] After owning and using both scopes, from magnification range to mounting ergonomics, the 4-32 is the more versatile scope. I wouldn't even consider a 2.5-20 for a 300 RUM, or any long action for that matter. The ergonomics of the 2.5-20 make it really difficult to properly set eye relief on anything other than short actions. Getting the eye relief right with these scopes is critical to minimize the eye box issues many guys have. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Anyone wish they would have bought the NX8 4-32x50 over the 2.5-20?
Top