Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Anyone wish they would have bought the NX8 4-32x50 over the 2.5-20?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shooters" data-source="post: 2134882" data-attributes="member: 7769"><p>Yup. Parallax is touchy and eye box is tight....obviously gets worse as magnification goes up. But that's where the 4-32 IMO is better than the 2.5-20. That's why I kept the 4-32. It was better in those two areas. Still not great, but manageable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shooters, post: 2134882, member: 7769"] Yup. Parallax is touchy and eye box is tight....obviously gets worse as magnification goes up. But that’s where the 4-32 IMO is better than the 2.5-20. That’s why I kept the 4-32. It was better in those two areas. Still not great, but manageable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Anyone wish they would have bought the NX8 4-32x50 over the 2.5-20?
Top