Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
Anyone ever thought of this?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RockyMtnMT" data-source="post: 372719" data-attributes="member: 7999"><p>I agree that it is not possible for a group to get physically smaller at a further range. I do believe it is possible to get smaller moa further out. My rifle does this. I think it is one of two things. I think most likely it has to do with the stability factor for the given barrel/bullet combo. It takes more twist to stabilize the same bullet for short range (under 500 yrds) than for long range (over 500 yrds). I think this is where the term "going to sleep" comes in. Or I am just a better shot at longer range than short range.</p><p> </p><p>Steve</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RockyMtnMT, post: 372719, member: 7999"] I agree that it is not possible for a group to get physically smaller at a further range. I do believe it is possible to get smaller moa further out. My rifle does this. I think it is one of two things. I think most likely it has to do with the stability factor for the given barrel/bullet combo. It takes more twist to stabilize the same bullet for short range (under 500 yrds) than for long range (over 500 yrds). I think this is where the term "going to sleep" comes in. Or I am just a better shot at longer range than short range. Steve [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
Anyone ever thought of this?
Top