Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Any interest in the Mausingfield?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J E Custom" data-source="post: 1094147" data-attributes="member: 2736"><p>Good explanation !!</p><p></p><p>I agree with everything you said if everything is assembled correctly it should not be a detriment</p><p>and might help. my concern is that people will think that it will make up for sloppy work/tolerances</p><p>and the one thing I am sure of is that tight/close tolerances at the time of firing, equal accuracy.</p><p></p><p>I to am an inventor and holder of many patents, so I am always interested in new things/designs</p><p>But I remain skeptical because of the past experiences with "New" innovations that did not prove to be any better than existing designs. </p><p></p><p>I am also concerned about the latest trend of do it yourself Gun smithing. Good gunsmiths are not born, they are trained and a good one never stops learning and trying to do better. It takes many years and lots of skills to be good at it. I am all for do it your self , but Gun smithing is not the place to try it on. I would not have a nurse that knows her way around an operating room perform life threatening surgery on me just to save a few dollars. I would look for a doctor with good credentials</p><p>and a history of great success (Just like I recommend we find the best Gunsmith we can and save money somewhere else. </p><p></p><p>Again; Not against the design, just skeptical that it will be an improvement.</p><p></p><p>J E CUSTOM</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J E Custom, post: 1094147, member: 2736"] Good explanation !! I agree with everything you said if everything is assembled correctly it should not be a detriment and might help. my concern is that people will think that it will make up for sloppy work/tolerances and the one thing I am sure of is that tight/close tolerances at the time of firing, equal accuracy. I to am an inventor and holder of many patents, so I am always interested in new things/designs But I remain skeptical because of the past experiences with "New" innovations that did not prove to be any better than existing designs. I am also concerned about the latest trend of do it yourself Gun smithing. Good gunsmiths are not born, they are trained and a good one never stops learning and trying to do better. It takes many years and lots of skills to be good at it. I am all for do it your self , but Gun smithing is not the place to try it on. I would not have a nurse that knows her way around an operating room perform life threatening surgery on me just to save a few dollars. I would look for a doctor with good credentials and a history of great success (Just like I recommend we find the best Gunsmith we can and save money somewhere else. Again; Not against the design, just skeptical that it will be an improvement. J E CUSTOM [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Any interest in the Mausingfield?
Top