Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Any interest in the Mausingfield?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J E Custom" data-source="post: 1093226" data-attributes="member: 2736"><p>After viewing all the video and text I could find I have an opinion about the design function</p><p>and the price.</p><p></p><p>Note: This is just an Opinion !!</p><p></p><p>It sounds like a clever way to maintain the same bolt lug and receiver lug contact. my problem would be that it will possibly allow the bolt face to move off square to the case head. this could</p><p>alter the case head to something other than 90o to the chamber.</p><p></p><p>In the past we have used oversized bolts and reamed the receiver for a better fit and squared the bolt face and lugs on the center line of the bore to prevent this. </p><p></p><p>Irregardless, when the lugs are square with the bolt centerline and the bolt face is also square with the bore center line when the rifle is fired everything will align properly. Minimum Head space also helps to hold the bolt in the proper position. (The reason some neck size only)</p><p></p><p>Again , This is just my opinion and observations and would like to hear others opinion on this design.</p><p></p><p>As to the price== There are plenty of great actions for far less that $1600.00 that are proven performers</p><p></p><p>Lets hear from some of the experts please.</p><p></p><p>J E CUSTOM</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J E Custom, post: 1093226, member: 2736"] After viewing all the video and text I could find I have an opinion about the design function and the price. Note: This is just an Opinion !! It sounds like a clever way to maintain the same bolt lug and receiver lug contact. my problem would be that it will possibly allow the bolt face to move off square to the case head. this could alter the case head to something other than 90o to the chamber. In the past we have used oversized bolts and reamed the receiver for a better fit and squared the bolt face and lugs on the center line of the bore to prevent this. Irregardless, when the lugs are square with the bolt centerline and the bolt face is also square with the bore center line when the rifle is fired everything will align properly. Minimum Head space also helps to hold the bolt in the proper position. (The reason some neck size only) Again , This is just my opinion and observations and would like to hear others opinion on this design. As to the price== There are plenty of great actions for far less that $1600.00 that are proven performers Lets hear from some of the experts please. J E CUSTOM [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Any interest in the Mausingfield?
Top