Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Any compelling reason NOT to use a Nucleus 2.0?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote=".300 Dakota" data-source="post: 2416099" data-attributes="member: 106514"><p>So on the long action, they say it is cut for CIP length magazines. Who makes bottom metal with a CIP-length magazine? My wildcat will end up seating right about 3.8" or so OAL. This means the CIP length is perfect. However, if I'm going to use an AG stock, I have limited options on inlets for bottom metal. Hawkins, Badger, or PTG M5 or HS DBM is it. Any recommendations on these?</p><p></p><p>Oh, and the case diameter is between an Ultra Mag and a .30-06. May have to modify the follower or magazine lips.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE=".300 Dakota, post: 2416099, member: 106514"] So on the long action, they say it is cut for CIP length magazines. Who makes bottom metal with a CIP-length magazine? My wildcat will end up seating right about 3.8" or so OAL. This means the CIP length is perfect. However, if I'm going to use an AG stock, I have limited options on inlets for bottom metal. Hawkins, Badger, or PTG M5 or HS DBM is it. Any recommendations on these? Oh, and the case diameter is between an Ultra Mag and a .30-06. May have to modify the follower or magazine lips. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Any compelling reason NOT to use a Nucleus 2.0?
Top