Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Annealing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="QuietTexan" data-source="post: 2534626" data-attributes="member: 116181"><p>If the warm fuzzies comment was in good faith, I'll apologize. Came off condescending, typically the annealing threads devolve into ****ing matches over which method is better and AMP is a favorite target of trolling by a group of people who refuse to accept tangible evidence that refutes their opinions. I'll eat it, thanks for not being a Richard back <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p></p><p>Flame annealing can produce very consistent, quality results. There's no reason not to do it if it's working. It's actually much harder to over-anneal with flame than is commonly thought based on a lot of testing done by several flame-annealing proponents. It might not have the repeatable precision of induction annealing but that doesn't mean that it doesn't have a place as a valid process. Avoiding split necks alone is enough of a reason to do it, and if your shoulder bumps are consistent then that's about as good as you can ask of any by-hand process, including DIY induction annealers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="QuietTexan, post: 2534626, member: 116181"] If the warm fuzzies comment was in good faith, I'll apologize. Came off condescending, typically the annealing threads devolve into ****ing matches over which method is better and AMP is a favorite target of trolling by a group of people who refuse to accept tangible evidence that refutes their opinions. I'll eat it, thanks for not being a Richard back :cool::cool: Flame annealing can produce very consistent, quality results. There's no reason not to do it if it's working. It's actually much harder to over-anneal with flame than is commonly thought based on a lot of testing done by several flame-annealing proponents. It might not have the repeatable precision of induction annealing but that doesn't mean that it doesn't have a place as a valid process. Avoiding split necks alone is enough of a reason to do it, and if your shoulder bumps are consistent then that's about as good as you can ask of any by-hand process, including DIY induction annealers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Annealing
Top