Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Am I the only one??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="goodgrouper" data-source="post: 145281" data-attributes="member: 2852"><p>Here's an idea:</p><p></p><p>If they will not change the length of their die bodies, why couldn't RCBS or someone else make shellholders that are thinner in increments of say .005"? Make some at -.005", -.010", -.015", and -.020" for the severly long dies. I don't think they would have to do it in all their shellholders, just maybe #3, #4, #10, #43, and #32 just to name a few. Redding already makes thicker ones so it wouldn't be too hard to make thinner ones. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="goodgrouper, post: 145281, member: 2852"] Here's an idea: If they will not change the length of their die bodies, why couldn't RCBS or someone else make shellholders that are thinner in increments of say .005"? Make some at -.005", -.010", -.015", and -.020" for the severly long dies. I don't think they would have to do it in all their shellholders, just maybe #3, #4, #10, #43, and #32 just to name a few. Redding already makes thicker ones so it wouldn't be too hard to make thinner ones. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Am I the only one??
Top