Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Accubond or Berger?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="venom600" data-source="post: 490132" data-attributes="member: 30515"><p>I'm having the same debate myself, except my debate is between:</p><p>Accubond 200</p><p>Barnes Tipped TSX 200</p><p>Berger 210 VLD</p><p></p><p>I'm still figuring out which is most accurate in my new rifle (just broke the barrel in last weekend, it's a .300 RUM Sendero), but based on what I've read so far on terminal ballistics I'm really hoping the Accubond is accurate in my rifle.</p><p></p><p>It seems (again....based on what I've *read*...no real experience with these 3 bullets for me yet) that the Accubond would be the better bullet at long range because of its ability to expand at lower velocities.</p><p></p><p>Don't the mono-metal bullets require higher velocity to expand properly, making them less lethal at longer ranges (and lower velocities)?</p><p></p><p>Don't mean to hijack the thread, but seems relevant.....if not, lemme know and I'll start my own thread. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>--Ben</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="venom600, post: 490132, member: 30515"] I'm having the same debate myself, except my debate is between: Accubond 200 Barnes Tipped TSX 200 Berger 210 VLD I'm still figuring out which is most accurate in my new rifle (just broke the barrel in last weekend, it's a .300 RUM Sendero), but based on what I've read so far on terminal ballistics I'm really hoping the Accubond is accurate in my rifle. It seems (again....based on what I've *read*...no real experience with these 3 bullets for me yet) that the Accubond would be the better bullet at long range because of its ability to expand at lower velocities. Don't the mono-metal bullets require higher velocity to expand properly, making them less lethal at longer ranges (and lower velocities)? Don't mean to hijack the thread, but seems relevant.....if not, lemme know and I'll start my own thread. :) --Ben [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Accubond or Berger?
Top