Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
A little stumped load development virgin brass vs once fired
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="4thefunofit" data-source="post: 2452639" data-attributes="member: 119789"><p>Something Richard Lee mentions in his 2nd edition of Modern Reloading might apply here. According to Mr. Lee, if the case is filled enough to be compressed, it's likely to burn slower than a case having less powder but is not compressed, and produce less pressure (pages 86, 87). This could explain increased pressure if the original load was compressed and the later charge uncompressed the load.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="4thefunofit, post: 2452639, member: 119789"] Something Richard Lee mentions in his 2nd edition of Modern Reloading might apply here. According to Mr. Lee, if the case is filled enough to be compressed, it's likely to burn slower than a case having less powder but is not compressed, and produce less pressure (pages 86, 87). This could explain increased pressure if the original load was compressed and the later charge uncompressed the load. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
A little stumped load development virgin brass vs once fired
Top