Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
7mm vs 300 wm.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="436" data-source="post: 489635" data-attributes="member: 16609"><p><u>LTLR</u>,</p><p> You may well be right, if you look at it the way you've describe it; I understand the .300 Win Mag with a load of… oh say'.., 80gr of H1000 and a 210gr bullet should or could reach 2900 fps to 3000 fps depending on rifle barrel and other extenuating factors. On my first post you'll see where I used the words "at the same velocity" just trying to get an idea of optimum BC performance out of each bullet in a realist hunting rifle length. </p><p> So my numbers aren't "flawed" I'm just not approaching the question the same way you are. </p><p> </p><p> I don't think it's arguable that your number are wrong, only that if your going to make a optimum bullet comparison for the sake of a conversation, we need too fly them at the same velocity and see if there is a credible argument as to that optimum bullet weight and BC for the calibers. </p><p> </p><p> I'm sure someone could chime in and say, their using a 30 plus inch barrel on their 7mm Remington Mag, with a 180gr. and skew the numbers again.</p><p> By the way you didn't mention what barrel length you were obtaining 3250 fps out of.</p><p> </p><p> I do agree in principal as to your apples and oranges analogy in the discussion... They<u> are</u> both in their own league, that's why their two different calibers and case designs.</p><p> </p><p> As I said in my post, I like the .30 calibers…. But to have a clear cut advantage in any rifle caliber… I think 500 fps is the key.. just my .02</p><p>Take care.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p> 436</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="436, post: 489635, member: 16609"] [U]LTLR[/U], You may well be right, if you look at it the way you’ve describe it; I understand the .300 Win Mag with a load of… oh say’.., 80gr of H1000 and a 210gr bullet should or could reach 2900 fps to 3000 fps depending on rifle barrel and other extenuating factors. On my first post you’ll see where I used the words “at the same velocity” just trying to get an idea of optimum BC performance out of each bullet in a realist hunting rifle length. So my numbers aren’t “flawed” I’m just not approaching the question the same way you are. I don’t think it’s arguable that your number are wrong, only that if your going to make a optimum bullet comparison for the sake of a conversation, we need too fly them at the same velocity and see if there is a credible argument as to that optimum bullet weight and BC for the calibers. I’m sure someone could chime in and say, their using a 30 plus inch barrel on their 7mm Remington Mag, with a 180gr. and skew the numbers again. By the way you didn’t mention what barrel length you were obtaining 3250 fps out of. I do agree in principal as to your apples and oranges analogy in the discussion... They[U] are[/U] both in their own league, that’s why their two different calibers and case designs. As I said in my post, I like the .30 calibers…. But to have a clear cut advantage in any rifle caliber… I think 500 fps is the key.. just my .02 Take care.:) 436 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
7mm vs 300 wm.
Top