Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7mm PRC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="7.62 Gunner" data-source="post: 2599504" data-attributes="member: 121641"><p>If it has less capacity than the 7 RM then no, both of those are 83-84 grains.</p><p>My point is that for the length of the 7 prc a fatter body would've been awesome to really give it a capacity advantage while working in a med action.</p><p>The same is true with the 300 prc, you need a magazine length of 3.7+ with 225s while my 30 nos seated correctly is 3.6", and it has a 4-5 grain capacity advantage. Longer/skinnier is retarded and it's the biggest design flaw with the PRCs</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="7.62 Gunner, post: 2599504, member: 121641"] If it has less capacity than the 7 RM then no, both of those are 83-84 grains. My point is that for the length of the 7 prc a fatter body would've been awesome to really give it a capacity advantage while working in a med action. The same is true with the 300 prc, you need a magazine length of 3.7+ with 225s while my 30 nos seated correctly is 3.6", and it has a 4-5 grain capacity advantage. Longer/skinnier is retarded and it's the biggest design flaw with the PRCs [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7mm PRC
Top