Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
7 lrm Thoughts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WildRose" data-source="post: 1470587" data-attributes="member: 30902"><p>And? More importantly than marketing the .300 H&H was the parent case for all of the belted magnums that followed.</p><p></p><p>The term "head" in head stamp comes from the fact that until the advent of bolt action rifles pretty much everything had to be regulated, or "spaced" off of Case Head.</p><p></p><p>Rigby and other got around the need for the flange, Rum, and belt with radically different tapers and shoulder designs than the H&H and Weatherby magnums.</p><p></p><p>The fact remains that positive extraction was most certainly a consideration in using the belt and head spacing off of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WildRose, post: 1470587, member: 30902"] And? More importantly than marketing the .300 H&H was the parent case for all of the belted magnums that followed. The term "head" in head stamp comes from the fact that until the advent of bolt action rifles pretty much everything had to be regulated, or "spaced" off of Case Head. Rigby and other got around the need for the flange, Rum, and belt with radically different tapers and shoulder designs than the H&H and Weatherby magnums. The fact remains that positive extraction was most certainly a consideration in using the belt and head spacing off of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
7 lrm Thoughts
Top