Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
6.5x284 or .300wsm??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TexasHunter" data-source="post: 544773" data-attributes="member: 26082"><p>What 300WSMMAD said is right on. The 6.5-284 is a barrel burner. We've found that the 300WSM is a good round if you handload. Hard to get great accuracy from most the factory stuff in our experience. We expect sub half moa with factory ammo from our rifles. </p><p></p><p>So let me offer a couple of suggestions as well. If I wanted to do everything you mentioned in one rifle, I would probably go to the tried and true 7mm Rem Mag. Not that I don't like the straight .284 - I love it but virtually no factory ammo. You have to handload. We very easily get sub half moa from our 7mm Rem mag builds with multiple factory loads. The second suggestion for bigger game at longer range would be the 300 Win Mag. Tons of factory ammo. Easy to handload for. Slightly bigger 30 caliber bullet for the bigger critters. The single caveat for both of these is that you HAVE to use a muzzle brake. Our hunting weight 7 mags with our brakes recoil about like a .243. The 300 mags feel about like a .308. You will only get the practice you need to be competent at long range if you spend alot of time on the trigger sending rounds downrange. if the rifle wears you out with recoil, you won't spend the time. The traditional downside to brakes is the noise. We have partially solved that problem on our hunting guns by angling the ports 11 degrees forward which sends most of the noise away from the shooter. So far, no complaints from other shooters on the line either. Or from multiple African PHs.</p><p></p><p>Good luck and safe hunting.</p><p></p><p>Dale</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TexasHunter, post: 544773, member: 26082"] What 300WSMMAD said is right on. The 6.5-284 is a barrel burner. We've found that the 300WSM is a good round if you handload. Hard to get great accuracy from most the factory stuff in our experience. We expect sub half moa with factory ammo from our rifles. So let me offer a couple of suggestions as well. If I wanted to do everything you mentioned in one rifle, I would probably go to the tried and true 7mm Rem Mag. Not that I don't like the straight .284 - I love it but virtually no factory ammo. You have to handload. We very easily get sub half moa from our 7mm Rem mag builds with multiple factory loads. The second suggestion for bigger game at longer range would be the 300 Win Mag. Tons of factory ammo. Easy to handload for. Slightly bigger 30 caliber bullet for the bigger critters. The single caveat for both of these is that you HAVE to use a muzzle brake. Our hunting weight 7 mags with our brakes recoil about like a .243. The 300 mags feel about like a .308. You will only get the practice you need to be competent at long range if you spend alot of time on the trigger sending rounds downrange. if the rifle wears you out with recoil, you won't spend the time. The traditional downside to brakes is the noise. We have partially solved that problem on our hunting guns by angling the ports 11 degrees forward which sends most of the noise away from the shooter. So far, no complaints from other shooters on the line either. Or from multiple African PHs. Good luck and safe hunting. Dale [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
6.5x284 or .300wsm??
Top