Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5mm Craze? 264WM vs 6.5 SAUM vs 6.5 PRC?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="7.62 Gunner" data-source="post: 2414181" data-attributes="member: 121641"><p>Agreed</p><p>Most match shooters were using 4350 in their 6 5x284s which is a known throat torcher.</p><p>Compare any similar sized case with the same powders and there's very little difference between them in terms of barrel life.</p><p>People have been claiming all sorts of stuff about shoulder angle, and longer necks extending throat life but there's zero scientific evidence to support any of it.</p><p>Certainly real world feedback debunks those claims</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="7.62 Gunner, post: 2414181, member: 121641"] Agreed Most match shooters were using 4350 in their 6 5x284s which is a known throat torcher. Compare any similar sized case with the same powders and there's very little difference between them in terms of barrel life. People have been claiming all sorts of stuff about shoulder angle, and longer necks extending throat life but there's zero scientific evidence to support any of it. Certainly real world feedback debunks those claims [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5mm Craze? 264WM vs 6.5 SAUM vs 6.5 PRC?
Top