Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
6.5 PRC Powder Charge/Velocity Ladder Test. No Flat Spot
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Leaf Litter" data-source="post: 2948988" data-attributes="member: 124584"><p>I hear you about my "delivery," but I also stand firm on my statement. I guess my frustration lies in the fact that there is SOOOOO much bad information out there and nobody really cares to clear it up. I followed the velocity node method when I first started reloading, despite thinking that it couldn't logically make sense, and all it did was burn components and give useless data. Saving reloading components is an admirable goal, lord knows its getting more expensive. However, there's always a cheap way to do something and the most effective way to do something, rarely are they the same. </p><p></p><p>I still stand by the fact that unless you're running large number samples, your results will always be subject to statistical anomalies such as the vaunted "velocity node."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Leaf Litter, post: 2948988, member: 124584"] I hear you about my "delivery," but I also stand firm on my statement. I guess my frustration lies in the fact that there is SOOOOO much bad information out there and nobody really cares to clear it up. I followed the velocity node method when I first started reloading, despite thinking that it couldn't logically make sense, and all it did was burn components and give useless data. Saving reloading components is an admirable goal, lord knows its getting more expensive. However, there's always a cheap way to do something and the most effective way to do something, rarely are they the same. I still stand by the fact that unless you're running large number samples, your results will always be subject to statistical anomalies such as the vaunted "velocity node." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
6.5 PRC Powder Charge/Velocity Ladder Test. No Flat Spot
Top