Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5 creedmoor build
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greyfox" data-source="post: 2363359" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>There are a few attributes of the two stage that appeal to me…The Huber Concepts Stage Break in particular which I have used on a few of my rifles for several years have proved to be totally reliable, consistent, and have an exceptionally crisp, 2nd stage break. They use a ball bearing mechanism, are very durable, and are claimed to maintain consistency for 100,000 shots. </p><p>-The greatest attribute for me is the first stage sets up the shot. Once the 2nd stage wall is reached, it signals my brain to synchronize my trigger squeeze and sight picture into a single action….as opposed to two separate actions with a single stage trigger. With practice this synchronization is fast and instinctive. Well suited for the fast action and intensity of PRS and certain hunting situations. </p><p>-The 1st and 2nd stage pull weights are subtractive. For example with a total weight 2.5# trigger, the first stage may have a 1# of pull weight. At the 2nd stage wall, the break weight would be 1,5#. With this system I generally use light 2 stage triggers for rigors of PRS and hunting while maintaining good control, and less possibility of an unintentional discharge. </p><p>Just my preference, and surely not everyone's cup of tea.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greyfox, post: 2363359, member: 10291"] There are a few attributes of the two stage that appeal to me…The Huber Concepts Stage Break in particular which I have used on a few of my rifles for several years have proved to be totally reliable, consistent, and have an exceptionally crisp, 2nd stage break. They use a ball bearing mechanism, are very durable, and are claimed to maintain consistency for 100,000 shots. -The greatest attribute for me is the first stage sets up the shot. Once the 2nd stage wall is reached, it signals my brain to synchronize my trigger squeeze and sight picture into a single action….as opposed to two separate actions with a single stage trigger. With practice this synchronization is fast and instinctive. Well suited for the fast action and intensity of PRS and certain hunting situations. -The 1st and 2nd stage pull weights are subtractive. For example with a total weight 2.5# trigger, the first stage may have a 1# of pull weight. At the 2nd stage wall, the break weight would be 1,5#. With this system I generally use light 2 stage triggers for rigors of PRS and hunting while maintaining good control, and less possibility of an unintentional discharge. Just my preference, and surely not everyone’s cup of tea. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5 creedmoor build
Top