Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
6.5 CM, 6.5 PRC Enough/Effective for Elk?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="buzby" data-source="post: 3044009" data-attributes="member: 120420"><p>A bullet with a larger diameter, by hundredths of an inch, is not going to make up for a bad shot. </p><p></p><p>There are 6mm bullets that make a larger permanent wound cavity than some .338 bullets. I just don't think blanket statement of one diameter being better than another across the board is accurate. </p><p></p><p>I do think it's quite plausible that someone would have more practice rounds behind their gun shooting 6.5cm than a .338 whatever. That would make a greater difference than 78 hundredths of an inch.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="buzby, post: 3044009, member: 120420"] A bullet with a larger diameter, by hundredths of an inch, is not going to make up for a bad shot. There are 6mm bullets that make a larger permanent wound cavity than some .338 bullets. I just don’t think blanket statement of one diameter being better than another across the board is accurate. I do think it’s quite plausible that someone would have more practice rounds behind their gun shooting 6.5cm than a .338 whatever. That would make a greater difference than 78 hundredths of an inch. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
6.5 CM, 6.5 PRC Enough/Effective for Elk?
Top