Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="VLD Pilot" data-source="post: 1627582" data-attributes="member: 103947"><p>Are those chronographed velocities ? Or drop data velocities from a chart. I use Hornady brass and several different powders with a 28" Broughton barrel. Tim's barrels are the fastest I've ever shot. Still no 3000. Course don't believe I've ever taken a charge of powder into the actual neck on brass. My concern would be that if the powder is that far up the brass, the bullet is way into the rifling causing too much pressure. Again, this is only my experience.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="VLD Pilot, post: 1627582, member: 103947"] Are those chronographed velocities ? Or drop data velocities from a chart. I use Hornady brass and several different powders with a 28" Broughton barrel. Tim's barrels are the fastest I've ever shot. Still no 3000. Course don't believe I've ever taken a charge of powder into the actual neck on brass. My concern would be that if the powder is that far up the brass, the bullet is way into the rifling causing too much pressure. Again, this is only my experience. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag
Top