Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5 156 EOL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="codyadams" data-source="post: 1692975" data-attributes="member: 87243"><p>Found something interesting with my .260 AI.</p><p></p><p>After my initial OCW load workup, I took them out to the desert for some practice at range and noticed some significant verticle stringing at 1100 yards, about 12" up and down, but less than 2" of windage, as it was a dead calm morning. Shot a 5 shot string through the magnetospeed, and 50 fps ES. DANGIT. So I did what I should have in the first place, and ran a ladder test, going up in .2 grain increments across a charge range that it seemed to like</p><p></p><p>When I did load developement with the 147 eld-m, and first switched over to Peterson small rifle primer brass, I did a primer test. I got the most consistent velocity with CCI BR-4 primers, so naturally that is what I started with.</p><p></p><p>In my ladder test though, I decided in addition to the workup with the BR-4's, I would throw in the same load workup using cci small rifle magnum primers. I thought, just maybe, the heavier bullet needs more ignition.</p><p></p><p>Well when I chronoed these loads, sure enough, the mag primers made a huge difference. Velocity was much more stable, and for some reason, loads with the BR-4 primers of similar velocity would exhibit some pressure signs where the mag primers would not. Just overall much better with the mag primers.</p><p></p><p>From 48.6 to 49.4, there was only 16 fps extreme spread, an S.D. of 7 and the average was 2920 fps and showed no pressure. So, I loaded up 6 of those and went to the range to see if they would also group well, as my ladder testing was inconclusive as far as groups, the magnetospeed bayonet kills accuracy in my rifle. They grouped under half MOA, and I wasn't the steadiest, so I called it good and loaded up 20 of them, opened up the tips with a .030" wire drill bit, and later today I am going to go test them on pronghorn, as it is opening day of doe/fawn season!!![ATTACH=full]145281[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="codyadams, post: 1692975, member: 87243"] Found something interesting with my .260 AI. After my initial OCW load workup, I took them out to the desert for some practice at range and noticed some significant verticle stringing at 1100 yards, about 12" up and down, but less than 2" of windage, as it was a dead calm morning. Shot a 5 shot string through the magnetospeed, and 50 fps ES. DANGIT. So I did what I should have in the first place, and ran a ladder test, going up in .2 grain increments across a charge range that it seemed to like When I did load developement with the 147 eld-m, and first switched over to Peterson small rifle primer brass, I did a primer test. I got the most consistent velocity with CCI BR-4 primers, so naturally that is what I started with. In my ladder test though, I decided in addition to the workup with the BR-4's, I would throw in the same load workup using cci small rifle magnum primers. I thought, just maybe, the heavier bullet needs more ignition. Well when I chronoed these loads, sure enough, the mag primers made a huge difference. Velocity was much more stable, and for some reason, loads with the BR-4 primers of similar velocity would exhibit some pressure signs where the mag primers would not. Just overall much better with the mag primers. From 48.6 to 49.4, there was only 16 fps extreme spread, an S.D. of 7 and the average was 2920 fps and showed no pressure. So, I loaded up 6 of those and went to the range to see if they would also group well, as my ladder testing was inconclusive as far as groups, the magnetospeed bayonet kills accuracy in my rifle. They grouped under half MOA, and I wasn't the steadiest, so I called it good and loaded up 20 of them, opened up the tips with a .030" wire drill bit, and later today I am going to go test them on pronghorn, as it is opening day of doe/fawn season!!![ATTACH=full]145281[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5 156 EOL
Top