Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
510 Allen Mag testing!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fiftydriver" data-source="post: 2744510" data-attributes="member: 10"><p>Never, not needed. Rail pinned, prevents any possible rail slippage, four ring set up positioned correctly prevents any possible ring slippage and properly installed scope into quality rings prevents any scope slippage. Never had a scope slip in the rings. In my experience, ring to base slippage causes most scope to ring slippage….</p><p></p><p>interestingly enough, without the muzzle brake, two quality rings will easily support any quality of recoil but there may be some scope to ring slippage with only two rings….</p><p></p><p>if a base is manufacturer to properly fit and fill the rail slot as they were intended to do with this type of rail, that meaning, having a lug with a quality snug fit into the rail slot, this would be a none issue. Unfortunately, variations in rails and rings do not allow this very often…. Four ring system is bullet proof cure. Some say unnecessary, perhaps with most muzzle brakes and most chamberings. I have witnessed early on my rifles shooting perfect for 20-30 rounds and then having obvious vertical stringing at long range. all mounting bolts remained tight.</p><p></p><p>reassemble the rifle and optical system, rifle would shoot great for 20-30 rounds and then vertical stringing again. Pinned rail, same results.</p><p></p><p>tested just multi rings and no pinned rail, same results, combined pinned rail with multi rings POSITIONED CORRECTLY on the rail, problem solved long term…. Since then has just been my recommendation to avoid any potential issue long term with my muzzle brakes and my wildcats.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fiftydriver, post: 2744510, member: 10"] Never, not needed. Rail pinned, prevents any possible rail slippage, four ring set up positioned correctly prevents any possible ring slippage and properly installed scope into quality rings prevents any scope slippage. Never had a scope slip in the rings. In my experience, ring to base slippage causes most scope to ring slippage…. interestingly enough, without the muzzle brake, two quality rings will easily support any quality of recoil but there may be some scope to ring slippage with only two rings…. if a base is manufacturer to properly fit and fill the rail slot as they were intended to do with this type of rail, that meaning, having a lug with a quality snug fit into the rail slot, this would be a none issue. Unfortunately, variations in rails and rings do not allow this very often…. Four ring system is bullet proof cure. Some say unnecessary, perhaps with most muzzle brakes and most chamberings. I have witnessed early on my rifles shooting perfect for 20-30 rounds and then having obvious vertical stringing at long range. all mounting bolts remained tight. reassemble the rifle and optical system, rifle would shoot great for 20-30 rounds and then vertical stringing again. Pinned rail, same results. tested just multi rings and no pinned rail, same results, combined pinned rail with multi rings POSITIONED CORRECTLY on the rail, problem solved long term…. Since then has just been my recommendation to avoid any potential issue long term with my muzzle brakes and my wildcats. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
510 Allen Mag testing!!
Top