Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
.416 Rigby and 378 Weatherby
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="durak" data-source="post: 563883" data-attributes="member: 34244"><p>You're right, the Cheytacs would be better. But as I stated before, I would like to fit in a standard mag action.</p><p> </p><p>I do not believe that either of these cartridges are "half-***". Just to make a point: I could say that a 7 STW is "half-assed", why not step it up to the 7 RUM? The point is that doing more with less is always a bigger challenge, and I like challenges!<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="durak, post: 563883, member: 34244"] You're right, the Cheytacs would be better. But as I stated before, I would like to fit in a standard mag action. I do not believe that either of these cartridges are "half-***". Just to make a point: I could say that a 7 STW is "half-assed", why not step it up to the 7 RUM? The point is that doing more with less is always a bigger challenge, and I like challenges!:D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
.416 Rigby and 378 Weatherby
Top