Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.408 Status???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Warren Jensen" data-source="post: 23002" data-attributes="member: 21"><p>Please note the tactics of Catshooter, AKA Paul Coburn. He makes a number of erroneous charges. When they are proven to be invalid he finds part of one of the pieces of information that is confusing to attack. By attacking this one piece of information he then expands that the author is shameless and worthless and all his resulting work is of no value.</p><p></p><p>He has completely ignored the fact that he was blatantly wrong about the bullet's composition. He was blatantly wrong about the expense of the ammunition. </p><p></p><p>Mr Coburn is not a professional nor is he a gentleman. He is not interested in a discussion. He seems only to be interested in personal attacks and making himself look good at the expense of someone else. Those of you who read a number of forums recognize the tactics and recognize that Mr. Coburn uses these tactics many times over. </p><p></p><p>Mr. Coburn comments are, more than anything else, a waste of my time and a clear reason why these forums eventually become tiresome.</p><p></p><p>If I am off-base, let me know, in a private E-mail.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Warren Jensen, post: 23002, member: 21"] Please note the tactics of Catshooter, AKA Paul Coburn. He makes a number of erroneous charges. When they are proven to be invalid he finds part of one of the pieces of information that is confusing to attack. By attacking this one piece of information he then expands that the author is shameless and worthless and all his resulting work is of no value. He has completely ignored the fact that he was blatantly wrong about the bullet's composition. He was blatantly wrong about the expense of the ammunition. Mr Coburn is not a professional nor is he a gentleman. He is not interested in a discussion. He seems only to be interested in personal attacks and making himself look good at the expense of someone else. Those of you who read a number of forums recognize the tactics and recognize that Mr. Coburn uses these tactics many times over. Mr. Coburn comments are, more than anything else, a waste of my time and a clear reason why these forums eventually become tiresome. If I am off-base, let me know, in a private E-mail. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.408 Status???
Top