Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.408 Status???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JackRabbitSquare" data-source="post: 22999" data-attributes="member: 635"><p>Sorry DANTEC you posted right before me, I was not commenting on your post. I imagine that the 408 would perform fine and I am not a machinist so I cannot comment on the bullet precision thing</p><p></p><p>I am just looking at it under the cost idea; the military already have the 50bmg in mass production. Wouldn't it be simpler to produce some "select grade" 50bmg with some good solid bullet to utilize existing parts?</p><p></p><p>Does the 408 outperform a 50 with comparable bullets? If not why would the military change over?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JackRabbitSquare, post: 22999, member: 635"] Sorry DANTEC you posted right before me, I was not commenting on your post. I imagine that the 408 would perform fine and I am not a machinist so I cannot comment on the bullet precision thing I am just looking at it under the cost idea; the military already have the 50bmg in mass production. Wouldn’t it be simpler to produce some “select grade” 50bmg with some good solid bullet to utilize existing parts? Does the 408 outperform a 50 with comparable bullets? If not why would the military change over? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.408 Status???
Top