Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.375 H&H Longer Range Load - Help
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="comfisherman" data-source="post: 490303" data-attributes="member: 8394"><p>Good ol midway, had me all wound up as well. I was looking at a speer hot cor 235 and that is what inspired me to cross reference the bullets. I dunno what the bc on the hot cor is, but it has to be close to that of a hand thrown basketball. Stared at it for a while trying to figure out how barnes managed a .400 in the same weight. </p><p></p><p>Anyway, I think the 260 accubond is the one, am eagrly awaiting a few box's to try in my 375 ruger. Its bc was so close to the 300 but I can drive it a fair bit faster. I have not tried any of the whiz bang new powders in the h&h but have in my 375 ruger. Rl 17 vs 4350 weight for weight did an obscene amount of velocity more. So much so I loaded another batch of comparisons just to make sure. This is for a 20 inch tube so it may not be as effective when there is more barrel to burn the powder in. </p><p></p><p>I am curious as to what one of these guys feels like shot from the prone. Unscoped mine is 8.3 lbs and is getting 2600 with a moderate load of rl17. I cant imagine cuddling on the ground with it, gonna have to learn to shoot it off a sitting bipod at least for me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="comfisherman, post: 490303, member: 8394"] Good ol midway, had me all wound up as well. I was looking at a speer hot cor 235 and that is what inspired me to cross reference the bullets. I dunno what the bc on the hot cor is, but it has to be close to that of a hand thrown basketball. Stared at it for a while trying to figure out how barnes managed a .400 in the same weight. Anyway, I think the 260 accubond is the one, am eagrly awaiting a few box's to try in my 375 ruger. Its bc was so close to the 300 but I can drive it a fair bit faster. I have not tried any of the whiz bang new powders in the h&h but have in my 375 ruger. Rl 17 vs 4350 weight for weight did an obscene amount of velocity more. So much so I loaded another batch of comparisons just to make sure. This is for a 20 inch tube so it may not be as effective when there is more barrel to burn the powder in. I am curious as to what one of these guys feels like shot from the prone. Unscoped mine is 8.3 lbs and is getting 2600 with a moderate load of rl17. I cant imagine cuddling on the ground with it, gonna have to learn to shoot it off a sitting bipod at least for me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.375 H&H Longer Range Load - Help
Top