Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
375-408 CheyTac (Kirby Alert!!!!!!) question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bailey1474" data-source="post: 120755" data-attributes="member: 3249"><p>[ QUOTE ]</p><p>....I think people are getting confused by 'averaging' the energy loss figures for the 2 bullets. Yes, taking the muzzle as the start point, over identical distances, the faster one will have a greater average energy loss ....its average will have been skewed downward by the inefficiency of its early flight (when compared to the slower bullet)....it will, nevertheless, always be faster. </p><p></p><p>[/ QUOTE ] </p><p></p><p>Now that makes alot of sense. At least to my feeble mind /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bailey1474, post: 120755, member: 3249"] [ QUOTE ] ....I think people are getting confused by 'averaging' the energy loss figures for the 2 bullets. Yes, taking the muzzle as the start point, over identical distances, the faster one will have a greater average energy loss ....its average will have been skewed downward by the inefficiency of its early flight (when compared to the slower bullet)....it will, nevertheless, always be faster. [/ QUOTE ] Now that makes alot of sense. At least to my feeble mind [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
375-408 CheyTac (Kirby Alert!!!!!!) question
Top