Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 SIN Testing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Big Jake Duke" data-source="post: 996888" data-attributes="member: 29978"><p>Hi guys, </p><p></p><p>I had good luck with rl19 and the 338 sin, this carteidge did better with faster powders than i would have ezpectes. I remember reading that it was because of its super effecient powder burning interior design. I used the hornady 225s for load research and then the cutting edge 225s to finalize. </p><p></p><p></p><p>My rifle did not handle the powder charge that Long Ranger reported. I think i was 84 or 85 grains to his reported 86 </p><p></p><p>Velocity was 3100fps.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Big Jake Duke, post: 996888, member: 29978"] Hi guys, I had good luck with rl19 and the 338 sin, this carteidge did better with faster powders than i would have ezpectes. I remember reading that it was because of its super effecient powder burning interior design. I used the hornady 225s for load research and then the cutting edge 225s to finalize. My rifle did not handle the powder charge that Long Ranger reported. I think i was 84 or 85 grains to his reported 86 Velocity was 3100fps. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 SIN Testing
Top