Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
338 Norma Reloading Data
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="codyadams" data-source="post: 1820714" data-attributes="member: 87243"><p>I'll add in a little more data. I tried out H1000 and IMR7828ssc in my 24" 338 nm.</p><p></p><p>300 Berger EH</p><p>3.680 OAL (.020" off)</p><p>Peterson brass, unfired</p><p>GM215M</p><p></p><p>H1000:</p><p>86.0 - 2594</p><p>86.5 - 2613</p><p>87.0 - 2621</p><p>87.5 - 2606 - Best Accuracy, .550" ctc 5 shots</p><p>88.0 - 2673</p><p></p><p>IMR7828ssc:</p><p>80 - 2539</p><p>81 - 2578</p><p>82 - 2615</p><p>83 - 2662 - Best accuracy, .677 ctc 3 shots</p><p>84 - 2669</p><p>84.5 - 2714</p><p></p><p>From my observations, I would say the 88 grain load of H1000 was about the same pressure as the 83 grain load of IMR7828ssc, just judging from primer flatness. None of these showed any signs of pressure such as ejector mark, bolt lift, or anything like that, however the 84 and 84.5 load did have the ever so slightest of primer craters, where the 88 grains of H1000 did not, indicating slightly higer pressure on the 7828ssc loads. I personally don't want to get to heavy bolt lift stage, as that would be more pressure than I want to run on my standard rem 700 action.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="codyadams, post: 1820714, member: 87243"] I'll add in a little more data. I tried out H1000 and IMR7828ssc in my 24" 338 nm. 300 Berger EH 3.680 OAL (.020" off) Peterson brass, unfired GM215M H1000: 86.0 - 2594 86.5 - 2613 87.0 - 2621 87.5 - 2606 - Best Accuracy, .550" ctc 5 shots 88.0 - 2673 IMR7828ssc: 80 - 2539 81 - 2578 82 - 2615 83 - 2662 - Best accuracy, .677 ctc 3 shots 84 - 2669 84.5 - 2714 From my observations, I would say the 88 grain load of H1000 was about the same pressure as the 83 grain load of IMR7828ssc, just judging from primer flatness. None of these showed any signs of pressure such as ejector mark, bolt lift, or anything like that, however the 84 and 84.5 load did have the ever so slightest of primer craters, where the 88 grains of H1000 did not, indicating slightly higer pressure on the 7828ssc loads. I personally don't want to get to heavy bolt lift stage, as that would be more pressure than I want to run on my standard rem 700 action. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
338 Norma Reloading Data
Top