Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
338 lapua
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jmden" data-source="post: 335506" data-attributes="member: 1742"><p>I almost went with the then Phoenix Machine, now Defiance Machine, action with .750 bolt for the 338 Lapua Imp. A great action, no doubt. </p><p> </p><p>But, by the time I looked at the extra cost for pic rail and recoil lug, that are already integral to the BAT HRPIC action, I just decided to go with the BAT. It seemed like the BAT would be stiffer and the BAT is quite lightweight (lighter than comparable Stiller actions) especially considering that the weight includes the integral pic rail and recoil lug. An integral rail and lug were two less things that I had to order and install as well and being integral, they were a couple less things to worry about as far as them coming loose from the action, not properly aligned, etc. BAT also didn't 'bat' an eye or charge any extra to program their CNC machines so the action would be set up for the 4.010" Wyatt's box. Just my personal experience so far.</p><p> </p><p>Couldn't go wrong with the Defiance action, however, for sure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jmden, post: 335506, member: 1742"] I almost went with the then Phoenix Machine, now Defiance Machine, action with .750 bolt for the 338 Lapua Imp. A great action, no doubt. But, by the time I looked at the extra cost for pic rail and recoil lug, that are already integral to the BAT HRPIC action, I just decided to go with the BAT. It seemed like the BAT would be stiffer and the BAT is quite lightweight (lighter than comparable Stiller actions) especially considering that the weight includes the integral pic rail and recoil lug. An integral rail and lug were two less things that I had to order and install as well and being integral, they were a couple less things to worry about as far as them coming loose from the action, not properly aligned, etc. BAT also didn't 'bat' an eye or charge any extra to program their CNC machines so the action would be set up for the 4.010" Wyatt's box. Just my personal experience so far. Couldn't go wrong with the Defiance action, however, for sure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
338 lapua
Top