Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
338 edge?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="436" data-source="post: 429972" data-attributes="member: 16609"><p><strong>Steelhead</strong>,</p><p> Thanks you for the information on the cartridge and its performance in your AO... It sounds like you've had very good luck with both the rifle and cartridge…. And I do understand the bra$$ issue in today's economy, or in any economy when your shooting the big sticks.</p><p> </p><p> <strong>MT4XFore</strong>,</p><p> I don't believe this subject was hijacked. Conversations have a habit "by nature" of morphing into other conversational points with in the same subject matter related. That's just the way communications between people work…. which you can see is evident in yours post. </p><p> </p><p> Had ISU600rr wanted, he could have chimed in anytime, his last post was asking geargrinder a question'.., geargrinder didn't answer ISU600rr post, <strong>end of question</strong>.</p><p> </p><p> I would also agree with you, Steelhead made a very fine point(s)'.., and based on his experience with "both" the rifle and cartridge, the performance being stellar in his opinion.</p><p> </p><p> On my end'…, I was only asking how the velocity and case volumes were obtained… adding; there is a crap load of "numbers" {which I provided to Shawn for his opinion(s)} out there {not just for the .338 Edge} but as with "others cartridges" which no one can seem too agree on, so I was just trying to understand; which member's are the right numbers... </p><p> </p><p> <strong>Now let's understand something right now;</strong> I have "no", as you put it "crow to pick with Shawn" If I did; I just say it out loud… right from the get go…. I said "nothing" about whether I believe or don't believe Shawn… those are your words, and a very poor choice of words I must say. </p><p> Nor has Shawn brought that to my attention, so I must assume your acting on your own, and those were your comments.</p><p> As for you comment that I'm "trying to defame someone's character" that's a real stretch champ, no one has made any sort of attack on anyone's character, until now.</p><p> </p><p> Well… as to "sides" I'm surreally glad you're not taking sides…. One might misread your post thinking you are. Come on'.., ruckup troop; that is exactly what you're doing. You say you can read between the lines of my post and interpret and what I'm thinking?? Bull ****… perhaps you're the one wanting to stir the pot. </p><p> </p><p> You seem to think you know what I'm thinking… let's turn the table. You say "I'm overly condescending in my questions to Shawn"… Shawn's not complaining about that. You say "I" don't believe a word Shawn has said... So how do you know that? You've said that; <strong>someone needed to speak up!</strong> Your words… Are you saying Shawn "not" capable of defending his ideas; now "I" know is <u>not true</u> and everyone knows it, Shawn is a very skilled gunsmith, ballistic designer' and writer; he doesn't need your help to state his position in this conversation with me or anyone else, I don't really think "he" needs; a hero worshiping individual, to bring his opinions to the table.</p><p> What makes you think you're speaking for everyone that read this post? that's pretty **** center of the world if you ask me... There no mandate that someone has to answer anyone's questions here... even Shawn. </p><p> </p><p> I just asked Shawn a few technical questions; I provided what information I could fine that would relate to our conversation, which Shawn has responded to. Now if you'd like to answer those questions for him'…, you're more than welcome to give it a shot…. </p><p> </p><p> And if you have an answer(s) for ISU600rr's original post or lost question'…, jump in I'm sure everyone would be more than glad to read it. Other wise you might let ISU600rr and the others speak for themselves. I would've thought others would have answered ISU600rr if they had information they could provide him.</p><p> </p><p> So <strong>MT4XFore </strong>I'll make your day and withdraw my questions for Shawn, not because I don't believe they aren't relevant questions, nor do believe Shawn wouldn't respond... but because it seems to put a strain on you.</p><p> So this will be my last post on this subject…. </p><p> Cheers </p><p> 436</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> Ps: Shawn I wrote this post before you posted yours, this is really more for MT4XFore benefit... Try not to read anything into it, and thanks for your response</p><p> Cheers</p><p> 436</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="436, post: 429972, member: 16609"] [B]Steelhead[/B], Thanks you for the information on the cartridge and its performance in your AO... It sounds like you’ve had very good luck with both the rifle and cartridge…. And I do understand the bra$$ issue in today’s economy, or in any economy when your shooting the big sticks. [B]MT4XFore[/B], I don’t believe this subject was hijacked. Conversations have a habit “by nature” of morphing into other conversational points with in the same subject matter related. That’s just the way communications between people work…. which you can see is evident in yours post. Had ISU600rr wanted, he could have chimed in anytime, his last post was asking geargrinder a question’.., geargrinder didn’t answer ISU600rr post, [B]end of question[/B]. I would also agree with you, Steelhead made a very fine point(s)’.., and based on his experience with “both” the rifle and cartridge, the performance being stellar in his opinion. On my end’…, I was only asking how the velocity and case volumes were obtained… adding; there is a crap load of “numbers” {which I provided to Shawn for his opinion(s)} out there {not just for the .338 Edge} but as with “others cartridges” which no one can seem too agree on, so I was just trying to understand; which member’s are the right numbers... [B]Now let’s understand something right now;[/B] I have “no”, as you put it “crow to pick with Shawn” If I did; I just say it out loud… right from the get go…. I said “nothing” about whether I believe or don’t believe Shawn… those are your words, and a very poor choice of words I must say. Nor has Shawn brought that to my attention, so I must assume your acting on your own, and those were your comments. As for you comment that I’m “trying to defame someone's character” that’s a real stretch champ, no one has made any sort of attack on anyone’s character, until now. Well… as to “sides” I’m surreally glad you’re not taking sides…. One might misread your post thinking you are. Come on’.., ruckup troop; that is exactly what you’re doing. You say you can read between the lines of my post and interpret and what I’m thinking?? Bull ****… perhaps you’re the one wanting to stir the pot. You seem to think you know what I’m thinking… let’s turn the table. You say “I’m overly condescending in my questions to Shawn”… Shawn’s not complaining about that. You say “I” don’t believe a word Shawn has said... So how do you know that? You’ve said that; [B]someone needed to speak up![/B] Your words… Are you saying Shawn “not” capable of defending his ideas; now “I” know is [U]not true[/U] and everyone knows it, Shawn is a very skilled gunsmith, ballistic designer’ and writer; he doesn’t need your help to state his position in this conversation with me or anyone else, I don’t really think “he” needs; a hero worshiping individual, to bring his opinions to the table. What makes you think you’re speaking for everyone that read this post? that’s pretty **** center of the world if you ask me... There no mandate that someone has to answer anyone’s questions here... even Shawn. I just asked Shawn a few technical questions; I provided what information I could fine that would relate to our conversation, which Shawn has responded to. Now if you’d like to answer those questions for him’…, you’re more than welcome to give it a shot…. And if you have an answer(s) for ISU600rr's original post or lost question’…, jump in I’m sure everyone would be more than glad to read it. Other wise you might let ISU600rr and the others speak for themselves. I would’ve thought others would have answered ISU600rr if they had information they could provide him. So [B]MT4XFore [/B]I’ll make your day and withdraw my questions for Shawn, not because I don’t believe they aren't relevant questions, nor do believe Shawn wouldn’t respond... but because it seems to put a strain on you. So this will be my last post on this subject…. Cheers 436 Ps: Shawn I wrote this post before you posted yours, this is really more for MT4XFore benefit... Try not to read anything into it, and thanks for your response Cheers 436 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
338 edge?
Top