Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 Bergers out.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jmden" data-source="post: 386793" data-attributes="member: 1742"><p>Very true. That's the only number that I'm aware of for this bullet at this point besides a predicted G7 of .456. However, that's more or less the industry (misleading) standard on how to give out G1 bc's--the number for 3K and above. Take the same bullet and test it at 2K or 2.5K and often the G1 bc number drops, sometimes dramatically. Who wants to advertise a lower, albeit potentially more accurate average G1 bc? Doesn't make your bullet look very good next to the other guys.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jmden, post: 386793, member: 1742"] Very true. That's the only number that I'm aware of for this bullet at this point besides a predicted G7 of .456. However, that's more or less the industry (misleading) standard on how to give out G1 bc's--the number for 3K and above. Take the same bullet and test it at 2K or 2.5K and often the G1 bc number drops, sometimes dramatically. Who wants to advertise a lower, albeit potentially more accurate average G1 bc? Doesn't make your bullet look very good next to the other guys. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 Bergers out.
Top